![]() ![]() Why? Because so many people want a GF TS lens. There has been a lot of threads about this over the past 3 years here. Also with a shift lens, the optical engineers are making the perspective correction. I would say that shift is replaceable, but it gives you a 'You Get What You See' image. This was shot with the Canon 24/3.5 TSE LII on 24x36 mm, it is a shift-stitch from two HDR images. This was shot at 135 mm on 24x36 mm with tilt. Tilts, they cannot be replaced by postprocessing. I would think that shifts can be pretty much replaced by geometric transforms. I have no issue with altering perspective in post, but my main use case for camera movements is control of the plane of focus, which cannot be done in poet. But how much of us, especially amateurs, can justify the cost for a tilt/shift lens, especially multiple tilt/shift lenses of different focal lengths? How many of you just use post-processing instead of a tilt/shift lens? Who out there is using a tilt/shift lens instead of relying on post processing? Why? A big part of me likes to get things right in-camera. Thoughts? Also, no need to get angry about my musings. Plus, how many of those other use-cases can be achieved in post nowadays? Can the selective focus effect be done effectively in post too? Can panoramas be done less expensively with other means? I realize this doesn’t help in all use-cases for tilt/shift lenses, but I wonder if it covers the majority of cases. It appears Leica is already exploring the software approach. And if the focal length isn’t exactly what is needed, cropping occurs anyway. And, most manufacturers don’t offer a lot of options in focal length. Whereas with a tilt/shift lens, one would have to purchase multiple focal lengths. Plus, this solution would work for all focal lengths. ![]() This would negate for me at least, most of the need for a tilt/shift lens. I think Fujifilm could provide a solution in their cameras where it would show in the viewfinder what part would be cropped if the picture was straightened. The trouble I have with this approach is that it is difficult for me to judge what part of my composition would be cropped out if I straightened everything. Given we have 50-100 megapixels, I would think a little bit of cropping would not be too deleterious. I suspect the majority of photographers correct this in post instead of using a tilt/shift lens. I realize that there are various reasons for using a tilt/shift lens, but for me the main reason would be to keep buildings straight when the lens is angled either up or down. The most recent example of this tilt-shift trick was used in David Fincher's movie The Social Network during the Henley Royal Regatta Race.I was just wondering how necessary are tilt/shift lenses in today’s world. The mini-moving people look like animated toy figurines, and the train footage feels like something that should be in Mister Rogers' Neighborhood.īut if you think this is the first tilt-shift video you've seen, you're probably wrong. The end product is breathtaking, thanks in part to the simple piano-filled, emotive soundtrack joining the video. When it came time to uploading to the web, he reduced the 1080p product to 720p for Vimeo in Vegas. Then, he created the over-saturated look by adjusting the hue and saturation, and added a camera blur effect. That's not exactly how you do real time-lapse, but it works to get that sped-up effect. To turn the footage into time-lapse, Kennedy used the timeline feature in After Effects to reduce each clip to 27 percent of its original time. After capturing the HD footage with the video recording feature at 30fps, he then used some compositing and editing software to produce the "miniaturized" look, specifically After Effects and Sony Vegas. To do this, he mounted his Android device on a tripod using an old junk phone case, for which he glued to a 90-degree bracket. He obviously did.įirst, Kennedy had to capture the time-lapse footage with his cell phone camera. Kennedy said in a comment on Fstoppers that he was "overwhelmed with the capability of the Galaxy S2" and wanted to do "something cool" with it. All you need is a smartphone capable of filming in HD, particularly something like Samsung's Galaxy S II, which is currently available in places like the U.K., but is not likely to reach U.S. Time-lapse video taken with the Canon EOS 5D Mark II using a tilt-shift lens.īut Kennedy has just taught us all that you don't need expensive lenses-even expensive cameras-to take awesome tilt-shift video. Please enable JavaScript to watch this video. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |